MORE REFUGEES - FEWER SKILLED MIGRANTS | Sustainable Population Australia

An independent not-for-profit organisation seeking to protect the environment and our quality of life by ending population growth in Australia and globally, while rejecting racism and coercive population control. SPA is an environmental advocacy organisation, not a political party.


22 October 2009


Were Australia a compassionate nation, it would be taking in more asylum
seekers and fewer skilled migrants, according to Australia’s only
environment group dedicated to lower population, Sustainable Population
Australia (SPA).

SPA National President, Ms Sandra Kanck, says Australia could double the
number of refugees it accepts, providing that at least as many, if not
more (which is SPA’s preference), were cut from the skilled migration

Australia's humanitarian program is currently 13,500 annually, while
skilled immigration for 2008-9 is 115,000. Total net overseas migration,
however, for the year ended 31 March 2009, was 278,200 persons. As well
as skilled migration, this includes family reunion, New Zealanders and
those on temporary visas.

“We have no moral obligation to the people coming here under the skilled
migration program – they are not fleeing from war-torn states," says Ms
Kanck. "They are taking places we could make available to real refugees.

“With 22 million refugees in the world at the moment, Australia cannot
take them all, but we can accept more than we currently do – provided we
reduce the skilled migration intake," she says.

Ms Kanck says that Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s rebuffing of asylum
seekers and attacks on so-called people smugglers are a diversionary tactic.

"Mr Rudd is responsible for one of the highest immigration rates in
decades so his line on the current influx of asylum seekers is simply a
smoke screen to avoid public discussion on the bigger issue of the
immigration blow-out.

“Refugees have to wait in long queues for places to become available,
while at the same time Mr Rudd has an open door policy to people who
want to come here for purely economic reasons.

"Surely Australia can supply its own skills and not poach from other
countries," says Ms Kanck. “If we got rid of the baby bonus we could put
that money into training/retraining our current population and thus
decrease our reliance on the skilled migration program."

Ms Kanck added that a multi-pronged approach was what was required in
dealing with refugees. Diplomatic efforts could often diminish conflict
that cause people to flee.

"For instance, what is Australia doing to ensure that the Sri Lankan
Government is treating the Tamils fairly and humanely?" she asks.

Further information: Sandra Kanck 08 8336 4114